I’d
been reticent to write on one of the salient issues of the Trayvon Martin
case- African American males as “boogeymen” –
because D.L. Hughley
had already written an excellent commentary on this issue. But the more I thought about it, the more I
realized that this issue is profound, broad and multifaceted enough to require
a great deal more reflection and analysis.
My
first reaction to the lack of indictment in a case that cried out for legal
action, took me back to Hurricane Katrina. Reports on the aftermath of the disaster were
heavily filtered through the media’s
racism. Newspapers ran two almost identical
photographs of a Black couple and a White couple wading through water, carrying
bags of items, presumably groceries, etc.
The caption under the White couple read that they were carrying items
they had found. The caption under the Black couple read that
they were carrying items they had looted.
Negative
stereotypical images exploded from the media so profusely that when the
National guardsman finally arrived, and the throngs of desperate Black
Hurricane victims ran to them for assistance, the guardsmen wanted to shoot them! Had it not been for the presence of an African
American commander, they would have shot these fellow Americans they were sent
to help. Fox News would have been
obligated to provide context for the tragic, though completely understandable,
shooting of the “rioting” African Americans:
What would YOU (White audience) do
if a horde of wild eyed Negros charged at You??
The
pervasiveness of the demonization of black males throughout the American
“justice” system cannot be overstated. This
demonization provided the rationale for the brutal beating of Rodney
King, as well as the subsequent acquittal of the policemen involved. We witnessed it at work during the police “investigation”
of the Stuart murder case in Boston in which Charles
Stuart killed his pregnant wife and blamed it on a Black man. You may recall that the Boston PD more
closely resembled a Southern lynch mob than a professional police department in
that case. The reaction of the police in
cases in which Blacks have been falsely accused by Whites has been virtually Pavlovian,
thanks to the demonization of Black males.
The
implications of this demonization reach far beyond the criminalization of Black
males, all the way the White House itself.
The single greatest criticism of President Obama from people who
otherwise support him (like me) has been his apparent obsequiousness to his
Republican adversaries. There is no
need to document here the fact that Obama has been disrespected repeatedly like
no other president before him. Yet, time
and time again, he has extended the olive branch to his adversaries, only to be
beaten with it. While there are a number
of factors involved in this scenario (including his personality) one cannot ignore
the fact that Obama is under enormous pressure to avoid the “angry Negro”
label. The same American mythology that
created all the reasons African Americans have to be angry, also dictated that
under no circumstances should Blacks show any anger.
This
demonization of African American males originated as a justification for
slavery. Not only was the Black man
inferior, but he was bestial as well. The
more horribly African Americans were treated, the greater the rationale. This demonization was hardly limited to the
Black male. The sexually repressed slave
masters, whose wives were only to be touched for procreation, found relief in
the rape of African American women. That
rape was justified, of course, by projecting a definition of sex-craved
heathens onto the victims. (This dynamic
was touched on ever so briefly in the otherwise absolutely brilliant tome, Embodiment:
Toward a Christian Sexual Ethic, by James B. Nelson.)
Perhaps
the greatest tragedy flowing from this demonization is not the treatment of
African Americans by the media or the judicial system, but rather the fact that
so many of our people have been conditioned to believe it about themselves. Our communities are more dangerous than most
war zones because so many of our young people act in accordance with this
demonized definition of themselves. W.E.B. Dubois
once wrote that “To be a Negro is to see oneself through the eyes of those who
despise you.”
Something
positive could be gained from the Trayvon Martin tragedy if our leaders were to
push for some sort of symposium on this demonization of Black males. The conversation within Black America, as
well as with the larger community must change.
Despite the incredible resources of those who continue to demonize us,
we must somehow, some way fight back. We
owe it, not just to the family of Trayvon, but to all of the grieving mothers
who have lost their children to this nonsense.
I'm not sure that another symposium on the demonization of black men is what is needed to address this problem, largely because I can see it degenerating into yet another session where all the usual blow-hard suspects get up and showboat for the cameras. What's needed, I think, is a more sustained and substantial effort to change this course. We need changes in media and pop culture, changes in education (both k-12 AND post-secondary), and real leaders who not only step in front of the cameras to show boat when a Trayvon Martin-like opportunity arises, but who are in the trenches day in and day out calling out pundits. politicians and pop culture purveyors for propegating this image of black men.
ReplyDeleteAs a White person, the demonization of Black men and boys is deep as was bascially said in this article. May you and the viewers, be blessed by God, no matter if you believe in him or not.
ReplyDelete