Thursday, November 20, 2014

DO BLACK FOLKS BEAT OUR KIDS TOO MUCH?

The child abuse case of Minnesota star running back, Adrian Peterson, has focused some, but not nearly enough, attention on the issue of child abuse in the African American community.  Peterson has admitted beating his four year old child with a tree branch, explaining his actions by saying that he was only doing what his father did to him.  Most African Americans completely understand where Peterson is coming from.  One of the more popular refrains in the black community goes something like this, “My momma whipped my behind and I turned out O.K.” 

The truth is that historically, black parents had to beat their children severely to try to keep them as safe as possible in an incredibly unsafe place: The United States.  If a black child looked at a white person the wrong way (not to mention if that person was a white woman) that child could forfeit his life.  Of course the most famous case in point is that of Emmet Till, whose vicious lynching became a rallying point of the Civil Rights movement.  Till’s mother, Mamie Till Mobley, admits, in her biography, Death of Innocence, (incidentally written by my friend, Chris Benson) that she sometimes could not bring herself to discipline little Emmet as much as she should have.  The obvious implication being that had she been more firm, perhaps he would not have whistled at a white woman and subsequently murdered.

Divergent child rearing practices are only one of a plethora of issues that demonstrate the enormous divide in the experience and culture of white and black Americans.  Black parents have looked on with disgust as white children have run utterly amok in grocery stores and other public places, throwing tantrums and engaging in behavior that would have embarrassed any black parent to death.  I remember once many years ago, being in a store in while a white child behaved so outrageously badly that I leaned over and whispered to the white woman who was ostensibly watching him, “You know, there isn’t a jury in the land that would convict you if you knocked the hell outta that child.”  She looked at me in utter bewilderment. 

I would no more condone allowing a child to run wild in a store any more than I would condone using a branch to beat a child bloody, as Peterson did.  But the world is changing and when we don’t examine why we do what we do, we wind up being stuck in inappropriate behaviors that are no longer necessary, as well as counterproductive attitudes.  The world is still very dangerous for black kids, but the nature of the danger has changed.  We have to worry about brutal police, as well as neighborhood crime; neither of which can be softened by beating our kids.  Having more than two decades experience in Child Welfare under my belt- as both a worker and an administrator- I have been appalled at some of the attitudes I’ve heard expressed by black folks concerning corporal punishment.  We have to beat our kid. They too hard headed to obey if we don’t.

It’s saddening and more than a little embarrassing to hear black folks turn what had been a survival tactic into an indictment of our own children as somehow super recalcitrant.  Yes, most of us (including this writer) who received this severe punishment turned out OK.  But if we are going to get to the next level, that attitude needs to change.  We beat our kids to make them conform; to walk in lockstep with everyone else, grow up and get a decent job.  But, I believe, the time has come to broaden our horizons and expectations for our kids, not just to get a decent job, but to create decent jobs.   The creativity and sense of self worth that is required to challenge the system and create a presence in places like Silicon Valley is the same creativity and self worth that has been deemed as “uppity” and cause for attacks from folks like the KKK. 

We teach our kids to color inside the lines and to think inside the box.  Empowered parents teach their kids the  exact opposite.   One of the most powerful (at least for me) scenes I’ve ever seen in a movie took place in the film, “Searching For Bobby Fisher.”  The protagonist’s (a kid) teacher held a conference with the father and explained that the child was being distracted by a “chess thing.”  Every black parent I know of from when I grew up would have gone home (angrily) and disciplined the child for not falling in line behind this teacher.  But the dad, played by Joe Mantegna, totally understood that his child had a genius for chess that was beyond the comprehension of this rather limited teacher.  He stood up for his kid! He stood up for his kid’s right to be that genius!  

There is another aspect to the African American approach to discipline, when it’s taken way too far.  That is the good church folks who take being “washed white as snow” just a tad too far and  literally want to “beat the black” off children.  But that story is for another blog.




Thursday, November 13, 2014

WHY DEMOCRATS GET ON MY LAST NERVE

“Are you the most liberal member of Congress?” Daily Show host, Jon Stewart asking then Democratic presidential candidate, John Kerry.

Stewart handed Kerry a golden opportunity to reclaim the nobility of liberalism that had been demonized by the Republicans.  He could have launched into a gorgeous soliloquy: “If liberalism means a decent minimum wage ... then yes I’m the most liberal, if it means economic opportunity for all … then yes, I’m a liberal, if it means we should have clean air to breathe and clean water to drink, then, yes, I’m a liberal.”   The possibilities were endless.  But how did Kerry respond to this softball of a question?

He said, “no.”

With that answer, Kerry, in essence, agreed that being a liberal was a bad thing and he ran away from it.  The problem was that with the Republicans upholding conservatism as a great and noble calling- a position that was never challenged by the faint hearted Democrats-  there was no place to run to.

George W. Bush, who was AWOL during the entire Vietnam War, went on to discredit the military service of Kerry, a Silver Star medal recipient, and won the election.

Fast Forward to Mid-term elections 2014. It is obvious that the Democratic brand- as personified by Barak Obama- is in trouble.  But the Democrats have weapons.  The electorate is angry due to gridlock in Washington.  The Republicans are responsible for the gridlock.  They have set records for filibusters and holding up presidential appointments.   People want to raise the minimum wage.  The Republicans are against raising the minimum wage.  The previous Republican administration could not find Osama Bin Laden.  The Obama administration had Bin Laden Killed.

You could just see the advertisements.  A five year old blond girl holds a glass of dirty water with oil floating in it.  The announcer reads,” The Republicans want to take the power away from the EPA because they don’t believe in government.  If they do that, this might be what your family has to drink.” They could have run an ad with a huge man taking a sledge hammer to a model of Washington D.C.  The narrator speaks,” The Republicans hate government, but they want to run it.  Would you hire a baby sitter who hates kids?”  The ads would all end with the famous James Brown song, with a minor variation, “Say it loud.  I’m Democrat and I’m proud!”

Instead we got Democrats refusing to say that they voted for the Democrat president, ignoring their bases and running around looking absolutely ridiculous, shooting rifles.  Democrats cannot out-redneck the rednecks!  Say it loud!   I’m Democrat and I’m proud!
Of course, the president hasn’t exactly set a tone or example for the rest to follow.  Obama has shown himself to be tone deaf to the African American community and utterly obsequious to his Republican adversaries.  All of which brings us to the next related issue: poor democratic turnout in general, and poor turnout, specifically, in the African American community.

All of which leads us to two salient questions:  Do poor people not vote because they are ignored by Obama and the Democrats or do Obama and the Democrats ignore poor people because they don’t vote?  I have never heard anyone mention poor people since Obama has been in office.

The second question represents a phenomenon that completely eludes me.  It’s been just a few months since a white police officer shot and killed the unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, in Ferguson, Mo.  As the story unfolded, we learned that while Ferguson has a two-thirds majority black population, the entire power structure of the town, as well as virtually the entire police department are all white.  The mayor and police chief, in the aftermath of the shooting, displayed a disdain for the African American community that brought back memories of the pre-civil rights South.  All of this occurred because, apparently, the black folks in Ferguson do not vote.  Having watched all of this transpire, one has to wonder how and why Black folks could have stayed home during the mid- term elections.  Have we learned nothing from the Michael Brown shooting?


Has the African American community learned nothing from the efforts of the Republicans, bolstered by an incredibly activist, Right Wing Supreme Court, to deny them the right to vote?  The entire voting populace, black and white, needs to become much more sophisticated if we are going to make what passes for democracy work in the United States.  But maybe if the Democrats were not suffering from an identity crisis, their natural constituencies might show up for mid-term elections.

 www.williamgriggs.net